A judge has upheld DOGE’s authority to access data at three federal agencies.
In denying the plaintiffs’ request for a restraining order, the judge noted that the plaintiffs failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their claims, which centered on the idea that DOGE’s data access policies were illegal because they were implemented without proper rulemaking or legal authority.
The AFL-CIO and other unions argued that DOGE’s ability to access sensitive information systems at the three agencies violates the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. They contended that the federal agencies were unlawfully granting DOGE-affiliated personnel access to sensitive records without legal authority, as DOGE does not qualify as an agency employee under the Privacy
