A groundbreaking new analysis has emerged, challenging the mainstream narrative on “global warming” and throwing a wrench in the radical climate agenda.
According to researchers from the University of Exeter, the biggest factor driving global warming since 2001 isn’t the rise in carbon dioxide (CO2) levels, but rather a reduction in sulfur dioxide (SO2) pollution.
The revelation has major implications for the “global warming” debate and for the “environmental” policies that push for costly regulations and collectivist government control.
The researchers found that the decline in SO2 emissions, which have been linked to industrial and maritime pollution, has resulted in darker clouds, causing less solar radiation to be reflected into space.
This means that the Earth is absorbing more heat, leading to “global warming.”
The study, presented at the UK’s Exeter Climate Conference, raises questions about the narrative that CO2 is the primary driver of “climate change” and suggests that a reduction in pollution, rather than an increase in CO2, is behind the warming trend.
The researchers’ analysis of CERES data from 2001 to 2019 reveals a stark correlation between the reduction in sulfur dioxide and a decline in the Earth’s albedo, the planet’s ability to reflect sunlight back into space.